Epistemology

Experience or Reason?

Does substantive knowledge ultimately depend on experience, or can reason provide it independently?

Positions

  1. Empiricism

    Experience, whether sensory or reflective, is the ultimate source of substantive knowledge and concepts.

    Held by British Empiricism

  2. Rationalism

    Reason can provide substantive knowledge or concepts independently of experience.

    Held by Continental Rationalism

Methods used to investigate this question

  • Empirical Inquiry

    Empirical inquiry grounds and revises philosophical claims through observation, experience, and evidence about how the world or human cognition actually works.

    Open in Methods

  • Inductive Reasoning

    Inductive reasoning generalizes from observed cases to unobserved ones, or from a sample to a wider population. A strong induction makes its conclusion probable without guaranteeing it; a weak one is an induction still, just a bad one.

    Open in Methods

Discussion

Before asking what we know, philosophy has to say where knowledge comes from. Empiricists ground it in experience — the outer senses together with the mind reflecting on its own operations — and deny any innate content; rationalists hold that reason — in some versions by way of innate ideas — reaches truths experience cannot supply. The dispute is not over which beliefs we happen to hold but over which source carries authority when experience and reason pull apart.

This is one of several questions once bundled together as "knowledge." A distinct question — whether space and time belong to things independently of human sensibility or are forms through which we experience them — is treated separately under Space, Time, and Experience, and how a belief becomes justified is a further question in its own right.

References