School of thought

Environmental Ethics

Movement

Explore in the interactive map

Classification

Period
c. 1973 CE onward
Regions
North America (origin), Europe (origin), Oceania (origin)
Domains
Ethics, Philosophy of Nature

Overview

Environmental Ethics challenges the anthropocentric assumption that only humans have intrinsic moral value. Leopold's 1949 'land ethic' is the field's founding precursor text; environmental ethics itself took shape as a self-conscious sub-discipline of philosophy in the early 1970s, when Naess's 'deep ecology' argued that all living beings have intrinsic worth and ecofeminists like Plumwood linked the domination of nature to the domination of women and indigenous peoples.

Key ideas

  • Intrinsic Value of Nature: Nature has value in itself, not merely as a resource for human use. Rivers, forests, and species deserve moral consideration independent of their utility.
  • Deep Ecology: Naess distinguished 'shallow' environmentalism (protecting nature for human benefit) from 'deep' ecology (recognizing the equal right of all life forms to flourish).
  • Land Ethic: Leopold: 'A thing is right when it tends to preserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise.'

Key figures

Aldo Leopold (precursor, d. 1948) · Arne Naess · Rachel Carson (precursor, d. 1964) · Val Plumwood · Holmes Rolston III

Positions held

Influenced by

  • Buddhism

    Naess placed Buddhism among the ultimate premises from which the deep ecology platform can be derived, alongside Christianity and Spinoza's philosophy.

  • Romanticism
  • Transcendentalism

References