School of thought
Philosophies of the Will
Intellectual current
Classification
- Period
- c. 1818-1900 CE
- Regions
- Europe (origin)
- Domains
- Ethics, Metaphysics
Overview
Philosophies of the Will is a comparative historical grouping for Schopenhauer's metaphysics of will and the divergent systems that refashioned it later in the nineteenth century. It does not name a doctrine shared in full: Hartmann combined unconscious will with purposive idea, while Nietzsche first worked within and then sharply criticized Schopenhauer's metaphysical and ethical commitments.
Key ideas
- Will as Thing-in-Itself (Schopenhauer): The inner nature of everything is Will — not rational purpose but blind, irrational striving. Everything in nature, from gravity to human desire, is a manifestation of this Will. Liberation comes through aesthetic contemplation, compassion, and ultimately denial of the will to live.
- Will to Power (Nietzsche): Nietzsche recast willing in terms of competing drives and will to power while rejecting Schopenhauer's unitary metaphysical Will and ideal of its denial.
- The Unconscious Will (Hartmann): Eduard von Hartmann synthesised Schopenhauer's Will with Hegel's Idea, proposing an unconscious absolute that strives blindly but unfolds with logical structure — a bridge between pessimist metaphysics and systematic philosophy.
Key figures
Arthur Schopenhauer · Friedrich Nietzsche · Eduard von Hartmann
Questions engaged
- Free Will
Schopenhauer denies the liberty of indifference: every act follows necessarily from the character meeting a motive, and freedom belongs not to acting but to being, to the intelligible character that the will is as thing-in-itself.
Influenced by
- Kantian Critical Philosophy
Schopenhauer builds directly on Kant's distinction between appearance and thing-in-itself, keeping the distinction and identifying the thing-in-itself as Will. He set out the debt and the disagreement together in the Appendix to the first volume.
Later connections
- Existentialism Influenced by this tradition
The twentieth-century existentialists took from Nietzsche an ideal of authenticity as self-creation: the overman who breaks with the herd, creates his own values, and gives his life a style of its own. Camus read that affirmation of life as a form of rebellion against conformity.
References
- Sebastian Gardner, 'Post-Schopenhauerian Metaphysics: Hartmann, Mainländer, Bahnsen, and Nietzsche,' in The Oxford Handbook of Schopenhauer (Oxford University Press, 2020), pp. 545–578
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Arthur Schopenhauer, §1; Sebastian Gardner, Post-Schopenhauerian Metaphysics (2020) — Formation: Schopenhauer wrote The World as Will and Representation at Dresden in 1814–18.
- Arthur Schopenhauer, The Two Fundamental Problems of Ethics (1841), the volume in which On the Freedom of the Will (1839) appears as one of the two fundamental problems of ethics
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Arthur Schopenhauer, §5.2 'Moral Awareness as a Mode of Transcendence' (compassion as the ground of moral awareness)
- Arthur Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation, vol. 1 (1818), Appendix: 'Criticism of the Kantian Philosophy'
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Arthur Schopenhauer, §2
- Arthur Schopenhauer, On the Freedom of the Will (1839), chs. III and V (the necessity of acts given character and motive; freedom transferred to the intelligible character)
- The World as Will and Representation — Arthur Schopenhauer
- On the Suffering of the World — Arthur Schopenhauer
- Beyond Good and Evil — Friedrich Nietzsche