School of thought

Epicureanism

School

Explore in the interactive map

Classification

Period
c. 306 BCE - 270 CE
Regions
Europe (origin)
Domains
Ethics, Metaphysics, Philosophy of Mind

Overview

Epicureanism is the school Epicurus founded in the Garden at Athens around 306 BCE, and which survived in the Roman world into the third century CE. It identifies pleasure (hedone) as the highest good, but this is emphatically not hedonistic excess — the greatest pleasure is the absence of pain in the body (aponia) and of disturbance in the mind (ataraxia). Epicurus taught that the universe is composed of atoms and void, the gods do not intervene in human affairs, and death is simply the dissolution of atoms and therefore nothing to fear.

Key ideas

  • Ataraxia: The goal of life is tranquility — freedom from anxiety (ataraxia) and bodily pain (aponia). Simple pleasures, friendship, and philosophical contemplation are the path.
  • Death is Nothing: "When we are, death is not come, and, when death is come, we are not" (Letter to Menoeceus 125, tr. Hicks). Since we cannot experience death, fearing it is irrational.
  • Atomic Swerve: Atoms occasionally swerve unpredictably, introducing indeterminacy into the cosmos and grounding human free will against strict determinism.

Key figures

Epicurus · Metrodorus · Lucretius

Positions held

  • Libertarian Free Will

    The swerve is not in Epicurus's surviving writings; Lucretius and Cicero attribute it to him.

    Uncertain: Scholars dispute what freedom the swerve was meant to secure: some read it as the ability to do otherwise, while others argue that it protects our control over how our character develops (Furley, Bobzien) or only keeps the future open (O'Keefe), which is not free will in the modern sense.

    Question scope: Free Will

  • Physicalism

    Epicurus held the soul to be a body of very fine atoms spread through the whole frame, which scatters when the body dies.

    Question scope: The Mind–Body Problem

Influenced by

  • Atomism

    Epicurus took over Democritus' indivisible bodies moving in empty space, where shape, size and arrangement explain everything else. He then gave those atoms weight and an unpredictable swerve, so that motion would not run by the strict necessity Democritus accepted.

Later connections

  • Classical Utilitarianism Influenced by this tradition

    Mill defended the greatest-happiness principle against the charge of being 'a doctrine worthy only of swine' by invoking the Epicureans, who had answered the same charge; the school's identification of the good with pleasure descends from that hedonist ancestry.

  • Stoicism Reacted to this tradition

    The two schools competed directly on ethics (virtue versus pleasure) and physics (a providential logos versus the random swerve of atoms).

References