Position
Compatibilism
Free will is compatible with causal determinism: an action is free when it flows from the agent's own reasons, desires, or character, whether or not those are themselves causally determined.
Classification
- Position level
- specific
- Domains
- Ethics, Metaphysics
Overview
The compatibilist denies that the free-will question turns on whether determinism is true. What matters is the source of an action: whether it flows from the agent's own deliberation, desires and character, or from coercion, compulsion or manipulation that bypasses them. A determined action can meet that test; a coerced one cannot, determinism or no determinism.
The recurring objection is that this relocates the problem rather than solving it. If an agent's character and desires were themselves fixed by causes reaching back before their birth, then a manipulated agent and an ordinary one differ in their proximate story but not in any way that looks capable of grounding responsibility.
Position on
Held by traditions
- Stoicism
Chrysippus held that every action is fated, yet our assent to what appears to us is up to us, so we are rightly held responsible even though we could not have done otherwise.
Question scope: Free Will
Rival positions
- Hard Determinism
Question scope: Free Will
- Libertarian Free Will
Question scope: Free Will
References
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Compatibilism
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Compatibilism (compatibilism holds that free will is compatible with determinism; hard determinism holds that determinism is true and that it rules free will out, so the two contradict over whether a determined agent acts freely)
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Incompatibilist (Nondeterministic) Theories of Free Will, introduction (incompatibilists hold that free will and determinism are mutually exclusive, so we act freely only if determinism is false — the thesis compatibilism denies)