School of thought
Averroism
Intellectual current
Classification
- Period
- c. 1265-1600 CE
- Regions
- Europe (origin)
- Domains
- Epistemology, Metaphysics
Overview
Averroism is the Latin philosophical movement that formed in the Paris arts faculty from the 1260s and became associated with the autonomy of philosophical inquiry, the eternity of the world, and the unity of the intellect. It is named after Ibn Rushd (Averroes, d. 1198), who was its source rather than a Latin Averroist himself. The movement was also charged with a 'double truth' doctrine, although that label is a disputed later characterization rather than a straightforward teaching of Ibn Rushd or every Latin Averroist.
Key ideas
- Autonomy of Philosophy: Latin Averroists held that philosophy has its own domain and methods, independent of theology. Where they overlap, both pursue truth — contradiction between them is only apparent.
- Unity of the Intellect: On the Latin Averroist reading of Aristotle, the material (or possible) intellect is single, separate, and shared by all humans. Scholars dispute exactly what this account entails for personal immortality; it puts ordinary individual survival under pressure, but the consequence is not settled.
- Eternity of the World: Latin Averroists held that the world has no temporal beginning — it is eternal, sustained in existence by God as its eternal cause.
Key figures
Ibn Rushd (Averroes; the movement's source, d. 1198) · Siger of Brabant · Boethius of Dacia
Influenced by
- Peripatetic School
Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia developed Aristotle's philosophy on its own terms even where it contradicted Christian teaching; Boethius held that Aristotelian natural science must deny that the world had a beginning.
- Medieval Islamic Philosophy
Siger of Brabant and other Paris arts masters read Aristotle with Ibn Rushd's commentaries, in Latin from about 1230, and took from them his thesis that there is one intellect for all human beings; Siger also took his view that human happiness lies in conjunction with the active intellect.
Later connections
- Scholasticism Reacted to this tradition
The engagement is that of thirteenth-century theologians with the Paris arts masters: Aquinas's De unitate intellectus contra Averroistas (1270) rebutted Siger of Brabant's thesis of one intellect shared by all humans, and Bishop Étienne Tempier's condemnations of 1270 and 1277 censured it along with the eternity of the world.
References
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Ibn Rushd [Averroes]
- Pilar Herráiz Oliva, 'Towards a New Methodology for Natural Philosophy: Latin Averroism Revisited' (Mediterranea 6, 2021)
- Thomas Aquinas, De unitate intellectus contra Averroistas (1270), which coined the label for Siger of Brabant's circle in the Paris arts faculty, teaching from the 1260s and condemned in 1270, and the start date used here
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Medieval Philosophy, §2.7; Thomas Aquinas, De unitate intellectus contra Averroistas (1270) — Formation: the Latin current formed among the Paris arts masters, including Siger of Brabant and Boethius of Dacia, in the 1260s.
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Medieval Philosophy, §2.7 'University Philosophy' (Siger and Boethius of Dacia developed Aristotelianism within its own terms, irrespective of whether it contradicted Christian teaching) and §3.1 'The Eternity of the World' (Boethius on why Aristotelian natural science must deny that the world has a beginning)
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Influence of Arabic and Islamic Philosophy on the Latin West, §1 'Transmission' (Latin Averroes translations available about thirty years after his death), §5.4 'Averroes' Unicity Thesis' (Siger of Brabant and possibly other Paris masters of arts explicitly adopted the thesis), and §7 'Ethics' (Siger's On Happiness embraces Averroes' account of happiness through conjunction with the active intellect)
- On the Intellective Soul (De anima intellectiva) — Siger of Brabant (in Gyula Klima (ed.), Medieval Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary, 2007)
- Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle — Ibn Rushd (Averroes) (trans. Richard C. Taylor)